01

Trackly

The recruiting agent built for job seekers in an AI-native economy.

Kevin Astuhuaman · Jasmine Rattan · Devansh Shah · UC Berkeley Haas MBA

02 · the shift
What changed

Job search is becoming agent-driven.

People don't want to click through ten job boards anymore. They want an agent that watches the market for them and tells them what to do next.

Every tool in hiring was built for a world of Boolean search boxes. That world is ending.

03 · what's broken
Today's market is illiquid

Job seekers and jobs can't find each other.

43%

of senior roles at top tech companies never appear on LinkedIn in the first 24 hours.

18–22%

of listings on major boards are ghost jobs — already filled or never real.

The incumbents are paid by employers, not seekers. Their interface — keyword + location + title — can't express what you actually want.

Sources: Trackly measured sample (40 roles, 20 companies, Apr 2026) · Greenhouse 2024 State of Job Hunting.
04 · why now
The opening

Users already bring their agent. The supply side hasn't caught up.

Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor — people now expect tools to work conversationally and in the background. Job search is one of the last big markets still stuck in the old paradigm.

Whoever drives market liquidity in this new paradigm — matching seekers to jobs faster and better — wins the category.

05 · what we built
Trackly

A recruiting agent that drives liquidity.

Monitor.Reverse-engineered scrapers watch every major recruiting platform in real time.
Match.Semantic matching on the user's full context — not keyword + location.
Move.Alerts and warm intros in minutes, before the 100-applicant pileup.

Native apps for people who want a feed. MCP and CLI for people who already live inside Claude and ChatGPT.

06 · proof
It's working

Users are pulling us into their workflows.

100+

weekly active users at Haas — half of our class, fully organic, no launch.

52 min

median detection lag vs. ~7.6 hours on LinkedIn in head-to-head tests.

Berkeley's Career Management Center started using our data this week. Students ask us to give it to friends and partners at other schools.

07 · why us
The advantage

We're on the seeker's side — and we see the shift more clearly.

Incentives.LinkedIn ($17.8B FY25) and Indeed ($7.5B FY24) are paid by employers to hide and throttle. We're paid by seekers to show everything.
Substrate.Self-healing, reverse-engineered sourcing across every major recruiting platform. Not a hobbyist project — months of engineering.
Surface.First job-search product built natively for agent interfaces — already live as a Claude connector.
Team.Ex-Indeed PM, 5-year engineer, career-PM — all three living the problem as MBAs.
08 · where this goes
What success looks like

The substrate for how hiring happens in an agent economy.

Start with job seekers at MBA and graduate programs. Expand into undergrad career centers. Then open the platform to every agent and company that needs real-time hiring data.

LinkedIn and Indeed are $25B+ businesses built for a search-box world. We're building the one for the agent world.